Republican/Conservative – Chinese

14 Oct

China’s leaders would lean republican/conservative here.

Apparently they’d rather thump their chests and posture over some uninhabited islands, than participate in a world financial forum.

A la Boehner and McConnell,….. they address the important issues first.

From the Financial Times.    (registration required, but it’s free)

China’s IMF no-show

October 10, 2012 5:03 pm by Alan Beattie

IMF headquarters in Washington. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Yesterday, I was all “the emerging markets have a point about running the IMF”.

Today it’s facepalm time, as China says it’s not going to send its finance minister or central bank governor to the IMF annual meetings in Tokyo.

Apparently it’s more important to strike a pose against that notorious geopolitical bully, Japan, over five uninhabited islands.

Let’s not exaggerate: China isn’t going to miss out on a pivotal moment for the global economy by sending deputies rather than principals to this meeting. There isn’t going to be much progress on the IMF governance debate, and the fund’s more pressing problem – what role it plays in any rescue for Spain and Italy – is largely waiting for the Europeans to sort out what they want to do. Still, as with the IMF voting weights I wrote about yesterday, symbolism is important, and the Per Jacobsson lecture (named after a former IMF head) that PBOC governor Zhou Xiaochuan was going to give on Sunday is a pretty big deal.

The deeper point is this. Domestic politics is often one of the major constraints on countries playing an active role in global governance. (Never mind the next round of IMF quota negotiations – the last lot haven’t been implemented yet because, despite having cunningly helped force the reforms through, the White House dare not submit the funding request to Congress.) Autocracies can have this problem too. If China can’t send its top people to the IMF’s annual meeting because it is more important to posture about Japan ahead of the change of leadership in Beijing in the next few weeks, it doesn’t say much about Beijing’s ability to lead.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: